Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: M2 or Super Black Eagle 2?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    2

    Default M2 or Super Black Eagle 2?

    I'm shopping for either a new Benelli M2 or SBE 2. I hunt mostly pheasant, but I do some waterfowl and turkey hunting. I've had my heart set on the SBE 2 for some time but was told I should go with the M2 if pheasant was going to be the primary use for the gun, as the only difference between the 2 was the SBE 2 held a 3 1/2 shell and was $200-$300 more. Also, I was considering the Franchi I-12 but was told to go with the Benelli. Anyone's insight and opinions would be greatly appreciated

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    MO
    Posts
    301

    Default

    I own both the LH M2 and LH SBE2, use the M2 when blocking for pheasant and use it for a waterfowl backup gun. Both are great guns and perform flawlessly in ever condition I have encountered.

    As for differences, aside from 3” vs 3.5” loads, they way they breakdown and the trigger guard and in my mind are very minimal. If I were to have to choose one it would be the SBE2 for the versatility of shooting pheasant loads and waterfowl loads.

    As for the Frachi I-12, if go with the best you can afford. Again, SBE2.

    Good luck

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Mahomet, Illinois, United States
    Posts
    1,683

    Default

    With the loads out now I would go with the m2. Being a nova man, I used to shoot 3 1/2 for turkey and waterfowl. But the right 3 inch shell will work just fine. You can always buy a m2 and a reg. nova and it would about the same price and you would have the versatlity of both worlds. Nova's (8lbs) will handle the bigger loads better for waterfowl and the m2 is great for upland game.

    novaking

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Look at the ballistics of some of the premium waterfowl & other loads that came out with the non toxic rules. The advantage of the 3.5" was/is mostly when shooting steel shot. If you plan one shooting steel a lot you should consider it. I have one 3.5" shotgun I bought in the late 80's. I have not bought steel shot in over 10 years. Yes I still have some around. For predators, waterfowl,turkeys & all the rest a quality 3" is all I ever need. There is that 'wow' factor with the SBE & 3.5" though.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Lynnwood Washington
    Posts
    120

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by orange crush View Post
    I'm shopping for either a new Benelli M2 or SBE 2. I hunt mostly pheasant, but I do some waterfowl and turkey hunting. I've had my heart set on the SBE 2 for some time but was told I should go with the M2 if pheasant was going to be the primary use for the gun, as the only difference between the 2 was the SBE 2 held a 3 1/2 shell and was $200-$300 more. Also, I was considering the Franchi I-12 but was told to go with the Benelli. Anyone's insight and opinions would be greatly appreciated
    I would go with the M2 as that is what I have. It does equally well for pheasant, ducks and geese.

    No sense in wrecking your shoulder with 3.5 inch when 3 inch will work if you are not sky blasting.

    Mike

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    7,498

    Default

    I've got a four year old SBEII.
    If you offered me a brand new M2 and $300 cash for it, I'd turn you down.

    Once you've taken the SBEII apart and cleaned it there's no going back to a traditional style gun.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Orange Crush, I was in the same boat you are. I hunt mostly pheasant and quail but also hunt dove, turkey, duck and goose. I was battling going with the M2 or the SBE II. Yes, the SBE 2 is an extra $300 but it's worth it. 10 years down the road would you cough up $300 bucks to shoot 3 1/2s for that goose hunt you're going on? The SBE II is just as versatile for pheasant and smaller game but the fact is it CAN shoot 3 1/2s when you want to. Believe me, you'll be glad you did. I love my new SBE II. Let us know what you go with.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    DFW, TX
    Posts
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tucker301 View Post

    Once you've taken the SBEII apart and cleaned it there's no going back to a traditional style gun.
    +1!

    As long as you get a semiauto Benelli, you can'y go wrong.
    That said, I own the SBE2, so that's what I would recommend.

    The difference I liked was having EASY access to every inch of the insides of my gun, and the mid-bead. I could care less about 3.5's then, but the more hunting experience I get, the more I appreciate the 'clean kill' factor of premium and/or high energy loads.

    I vote for the SBEII.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    2

    Thumbs up Thanks

    Thank you all for your feedback. My heart is set on the SBE 2 and I really haven't heard anything to sway my opinion. So that's what I'm going with.
    Thanks again for your help.
    Brandon

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Elk Grove, CA
    Posts
    1,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ILikeRugers2 View Post
    +1!

    As long as you get a semiauto Benelli, you can'y go wrong.
    That said, I own the SBE2, so that's what I would recommend.

    The difference I liked was having EASY access to every inch of the insides of my gun, and the mid-bead. I could care less about 3.5's then, but the more hunting experience I get, the more I appreciate the 'clean kill' factor of premium and/or high energy loads.

    I vote for the SBEII.
    + another vote for the SBE II.

    I think the M2 is a great gun, but I also think the SBE II is much better built for the extra money.
    mudhen - CA

    "Lighten up Francis"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •